Louisiana Private Investigator Licensing Practice Exam

In the State v. Fluker case, what was the verdict for the defendant wearing a gun openly?

1. A. Guilty of intentional concealment

2. B. Not guilty

3. C. Misdemeanor charge

4. D. Expungement of records

The correct answer is: B. Not guilty

In the State v. Fluker case, the defendant's verdict of "not guilty" indicates that the jury or judge found insufficient evidence to prove the charges against him regarding the open carrying of a firearm. This suggests that the legal framework around open carry laws was significant in the case. The ruling likely reflects that the open display of a firearm, under the circumstances presented, was permissible and did not constitute any form of unlawful behavior or intent that could justify a conviction. This case underscores the importance of understanding the specific laws related to firearms in Louisiana, including the nuances of what constitutes lawful open carry versus concealment. A finding of not guilty generally indicates a successful defense, which might include arguments about the legality of open carry, a lack of intent to commit a crime, or other mitigating factors that demonstrated compliance with state laws.